Social Influence on Bullying in Schools

Social Influence on Bullying in Schools Introduction There is no globally agreed definition of bullying. Tattum (1993) defines bullying as, â€Å"the desire to hurt or put someone under pressure†.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Social Influence on Bullying in Schools specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Bullying is the most malicious and malevolent form of deviant behavior widely practiced in schools and yet it has received only scant attention from national and local authorities (Tattum Lane, 1998). The vast cases of bullying take place in on school premises and most students in playgrounds are affected (Whitney and Smith, 1993). It is therefore vital to understand better the interactions and activities of students in schools in order to place specific behaviors like bullying into context. Over the past two decades, there has been a growing awareness of the extent of bullying in schools. Research in this area, inspired by the work of Olweus in Scandinavia, has done much to focus attention on characteristics of bullies and victims. A good deal of research on bullying in schools has developed around a concern with personality and other individual attributes of bullies and the victims. This is obviously vital but can sometimes obscure the situational and social influences on bullying behaviors (Blatchford, 1993). The fact is that most bullying in schools goes undetected for the very good reason that the victims are too terrified to report their suffering for fear of reprisals which can often be brutal (Pepler, Rigby, Smith, 2004). The characteristics which typify a student who is being regularly bullied are known to us. Once a student has fallen foul of the bullying menace, and demonstrates that he will not ‘split’, the bullying becomes more intense and the ensuing terror increases (Pepler, Rigby, Smith, 2004).Advertising Looking for research paper on education? Let's see if we can help you! Get you r first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Social Influences of Bullying Behaviors Much has been written about the reciprocal interplay among the individual, family, peer group, school, community and cultural influences on human behavior (Espelage Swearer, 2011). Social dominance theory, Demographics, School and Family characteristics are very strong factors which affects the behavior of bullying in schools. Social Dominance Theory A social biological or evolutionary perspective offers a view of peer harassment through the social dominance theory (Sanders Phye, 2004). The theory helps us to understand that the behavior of bullying has to do with the bully-victim interaction with the individual who bullies (Sanders Phye, 2004). According to Pellegrini Long (2002), social dominance theory is, â€Å"harassing or bullying behavior which occurs to force someone into a position of submission, which can especially be seen in boys during the transition from primary to second ary schools as they figure out the new social hierarchy†. According to this theory the evidently stronger students in any school will tend to dominate over the weaker ones (Sanders Phye, 2004). This is the core reason why physical bullying has to do with the size and strength of an individual subjecting his colleagues to bullying (Carney Merrell, 2001). The theory helps us to understand why the stronger members of the school population are likely to â€Å"rule† over the weaker members of the school as described in the social hierarchy concept in the theory (Sanders Phye, 2004). For example, within-groups aggression can take place in the context of the school as a whole, a grade within the school, a particular classroom within a grade, or a friendship group (Sanders Phye, 2004). One clear method of establishing social hierarchies and status within groups is through the use of aggression (Sanders Phye, 2004).Advertising We will write a custom research paper s ample on Social Influence on Bullying in Schools specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Perhaps aggressive students are admired by peers because rather that threatening group cohesion they actually promote a clear hierarchical organization within the groups (Sanders Phye, 2004). This theoretical approach sheds some light on why the aggressive victim group of students is so disliked and rejected by classmates (Sanders Phye, 2004). These are the students who have the capacity to destabilize the hierarchy, thus making individual group members feel uncomfortable (Sanders Phye, 2004). Aggressive students have been found to attack both weaker and stronger individuals, whereas â€Å"pure† bullies most frequently bully weaker students (Sanders Phye, 2004). Social dominance theory provides rationale for occurrence of peer harassment across the lifespan (Sanders Phye, 2004). However, an evolutionary/developmental approach to this theory can expl ain why using peer harassment as a means to establish social hierarchies might be especially prevalent and important during adolescence (Sanders Phye, 2004). Demographics and Bullying Demographic factors such as family, self-esteem, peers, ethnicity and socio-economic status also have an impact on the bullying behavior in schools. Students who portray low self-esteem are usually at great risk of being bullied and being forced to submission to the aggressive individuals (Hinduja Patchin, 2010).Advertising Looking for research paper on education? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More However, it must be pointed out that, self-esteem is not the key factor that makes a student to be victimized. There is simply a correlation between low self esteem and being a bullied. The way children are taken care of by their parents is also a contributing factor to bullying behaviors in schools. According to Wang, et al. (2009), â€Å"higher parental involvement led to children being less involved in all forms of bullying†. Wang, et al also notes that, parents who have over protective behaviors for their children and also over involved in their children’s affairs predisposes their children to bullying victimization at school (Juvomen Graham, 2001). Friendship also affects bullying behaviors in schools. A student with more friends is likely to be less physically, verbally and relationally bullied. On the other hand, a student with few friends is more likely to be physically, verbally and relationally bullied (Wang et al., 2009). Socio-economic status is also a fac tor which leads to bullying behaviors in schools. A survey conducted by National Association of Health Education Centers in 2004 found that, students from low socio-economic status families in Black/Hispanic schools were more likely to be bullies. There is high correlation between being a bullying victim and the socio-economic status of the student’s family. Due et al. (2009) asserts that, â€Å"Adolescents who attend schools with larger economic inequality among students, and adolescents who live in countries with larger economic inequality, are at elevated risk of being victims of bullying† (p. 907). School and Family Characteristics Associated With Bullying Because school culture varies by individual schools and school climate is created by staff and student attitudes, it logically follows that school and family characteristics are linked to bullying and victimization (Espelage Swearer, 2011). A study conducted by Kasen and Cohen helps us to understand bullying at the school level (Kasen Cohen, 1990). Through their study this authors reveals to us the impact of school climate on the intersection of personality and bullying. They concluded that students who are bullied perceive less social support in their peers and students who are bullying perceive less social support from parents and teachers (Espelage Swearer, 2011). Conclusion It is imperative that the role of social support is an important contextual factor in bullying prevention and intervention programming (Espelage Swearer, 2011). The research base regarding bullying has grown exponentially since Dan Olweus’ pioneering intervention research in the late 19th Century. However, the field is still in a relatively early phase of development (Espelage Swearer, 2011). Several types of measures have been developed to assist school professionals in monitoring the progress of bullying interventions (Espelage Swearer, 2011). It is recommended that practitioners and educators work toge ther to identify a set of measures for determining the most effective school based bully based prevention programs. References Blatchford, P. (1998). Playtime in the primary School: Problems and Improvements. Windsor: NFER-Nelson. Carney, A.G. Merrell, K.W. (2001). Bullying in schools: Perspectives on understanding and preventing this international problem. School Psychology International, 22(3), 364-382. Espelage, D. and Swearer, M. (2011).Bullying in North American Schools. New York: Routledge publishers. Juvomen, J. and Graham, S. (2001). Peer harassment in schools. New York: The Guilford Press. Kasen, S., Johnson, J. and Cohen, P. (1990). The impact of school emotional climate on student’s psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18(1), 165- 177. Namie, G. and Namie, R. (2011). The bully-free work place: stop jerks, weasels, and snakes from killing your organization. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley Sons. Pellegrini, A. and Long, J. (2002). A longitudinal s tudy of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259-280. Pepler, D., Rigby, K. and Smith, P. (2004). Bullying in schools: how successful can interventions be? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sanders, C. and Phye, G. (2004). Bullying: implications for the classroom. San Diego, Califonia: Elsevier Press. Schaffer, A. (2008). The impact of the word bully and providing the definition of bullying on the reported rate of bullying behavior. USA: ProQuest. Tattum, D. (1993). Bullying: Understanding and managing bullying. London: Heinermann publishers. Tattum, D. and Lane, D. (1998). Bullying in schools. London: Trentham Books Limited. Wang, J., Iannotti, R., and Nansel, T. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368-375. Whitney, I. and Smith, P. (1993). A survey of nature and extent of bullying in junior and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35(3), 25.

Pleonasm Definition and Examples in English

Pleonasm Definition and Examples in English Pleonasm is the use of more words than are necessary to make a point. Pleonasm may serve as a rhetorical strategy to emphasize an idea or image. Used unintentionally, it may also be viewed as a stylistic fault. Etymology: From the Greek, excessive, abundant Examples and Observations: The most unkindest cut of all.(William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar)In the farmhouse I saw, with my own eyes, this sight: there was a man, of young age and graceful proportion, whose body had been torn limb from limb. The torso was here, an arm there, a leg there. . . .All this I saw with my own eyes, and it was the most fearsome sight I ever witnessed. (Michael Chrichton, Eaters of the Dead. Random House, 1976)These terrible things I have seen with my own eyes, and I have heard with my own ears, and touched with my own hands.(Isabel Allende, City of the Beasts. Rayo, 2002)As a rhetorical figure, [a pleonasm] gives an utterance an additional semantic dimension, as in Hamlets dictum about his father: He was a man, take him for all in all, I shall not look upon his like again (Shakespeare. Hamlet, I.2.186-187), where man contains the semantic markers ( human) and ( male) contained in father and he, but according to the context it has the specific meaning ideal man.(Heinrich F. Plett, Ple onasm, in Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford Univ. Press, 2001) pleonasm. Term in rhetoric for repetition or superfluous expression. Hence, in grammar, a category is sometimes said to be represented pleonastically if it is realized by more than one affix, word, etc.(P.H. Matthews, Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford Univ. Press, 1997)Ears pierced while you wait.I forgot my PIN number for the ATM machine.Many tautological (or tautologous) expressions occur in everyday usage. The tautology in some is immediately apparent: all well and good; to all intents and purposes; cool, calm, and collected . . .. In others, it is less obvious, because they contain archaic elements: by hook or by crook.(Tom McArthur, The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford Univ. Press, 1992)George Carlins Department of Pleonasms and RedundanciesI needed a new beginning, so I decided to pay a social visit to a personal friend with whom I share the same mutual objectives and who is one of the most unique individuals I have ever personally met. The end re sult was an un ­expected surprise. When I reiterated again to her the fact that I needed a fresh start, she said I was exactly right; and, as an added plus, she came up with a fi ­nal solution that was absolutely perfect.Based on her past experience, she felt we needed to join together in a com ­mon bond for a combined total of twenty-four hours a day, in order to find some new initiatives. What a novel innovation! And, as an extra bonus, she presented me with the free gift of a tuna fish. Right away I noticed an immedi ­ate positive improvement. And although my recovery is not totally complete, the sum total is I feel much better now knowing I am not uniquely alone.(George Carlin, Count the Superfluous Redundant Pleonastic Tautologies. When Will Jesus Bring the Pork Chops? Hyperion, 2004) Dougan uses many words where few would do, as if pleonasm were a way of wringing every possibility out of the material he has, and stretching sentences a form of spreading the word.(Paula Cocozza, review of How Dynamo Kiev Beat the Luftwaffe, in The Independent, March 2, 2001)Its dà ©j vu all over again.(attributed to Yogi Berra) See also: BattologyCommon RedundanciesGeorge Carlins Essential DrivelRedundancyRepetitionTautology