Australian National Cinema Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Australian National Cinema - Essay Example Hollywood draws its actors from different races and nationalities, with talent being the qualifying factor. However, there are other cinemas in the world, which, despite not being as big and profound as Hollywood, play a significant role in the film industry. These are non-Hollywood cinemas, which hold close responsibilities just like Hollywood in their own capacity. National cinemas play a major role in providing a means of identifying, assisting, legitimizing, polemicizing, projecting, as well as creating space both nationally and internationally for non-Hollywood filmmaking activity. Discussing these important roles of these cinema industries, this essay will draw specific reference to the Australian film industry. National film industries, despite not sharing similar popularity as Hollywood, play a big role in non-Hollywood filming activities; their tools and equipment could not match up to that of Hollywood (Yecies, 2004). The industry, though having a low capacity and low inves tment capital has high levels of creativity, providing hopefuls with an opportunity to display their talent to the world (Ward, 2004). Most of the national actors exhibit high levels of acting skills at the national cinema industry. National film industries, despite not sharing similar popularity as Hollywood, play a big role in non-Hollywood filming activities; their tools and equipment could not match up to that of Hollywood (Yecies, 2004). The industry, though having a low capacity and low investment capital has high levels of creativity, providing hopefuls with an opportunity to display their talent to the world (Ward, 2004). Most of the national actors exhibit high levels of acting skills at the national cinema industry. ... ction crew, production fees as well as casting fee and marketing expenses are part of the costs that movie producers and makers incur in the business. As these activities require a lot of capital, for any successful film industry, investors should show readiness to finance (Hoskins, et al. 1999). Some of the national investors show readiness in investing in the industry, with some financing even some of the films fully. Other financiers offer grants to film producing companies in order to promote proper filming in the country. The US studio New Line partly financed The Dark City (1998), despite being an Australian movie, directed by Alex Proyas. These are activities, which take place at the Hollywood movie industry too. Polonsky, et al. (2002) agree that since overhead production costs for a movie are relatively high, companies seek for financing from different sources, which they later repay from sales and loyalties rom the movie. Confidence in the sector is one of the main reasons why such investors heavily invest in the Hollywood film industry. They are sure of receiving back their invested capital from the film, if sales for movies such The Matrix (1999) is anything to go by. This film received an international audience, topping the international charts, and thus put its director, Andy on an international map. While the Australian film industry is yet to reach at such great standards, some movie ideas are worth the risk. Some of the most successful films in the Australian industry cost a fortune, which necessitates financing. Additionally, the growth and potential of the industry encourages investors, as they are optimistic in the success of the film industry. The fact that most of the Australians watch films produced at the national levels is proof enough that

MODERN LAND LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

MODERN LAND LAW - Essay Example Trusts of this nature are ‘created by a transaction between the trustee and the cestui que trust in connection with the acquisition by the trustee of a legal estate in land, whenever the trustee has so conducted himself that it would be inequitable to allow him to deny to the cestui que trust a beneficial interest in the land acquired. And he will be held to have so conducted himself if by his words or conduct he has induced the cestui que trust to act to his own detriment in the reasonable belief that by so acting he was acquiring a beneficial interest in the land.’2 The case giving way to Lord Diplock’s observations, Gissing v Gissing involved a scenario where matrimonial property was held in the name of the husband only. The questions for determination were: Did the husband hold the legal title upon trust for the benefit of both he and the wife. And if so, how were the beneficial interests to be divided? In cases such as this, Lord Diplock opined that court must satisfy itself on the evidence that it was ‘the common intention of both spouses that the contributing wife should have a share in the beneficial interest and that her contributions were made upon this understanding.’3 In many cases, the intention or common understanding of the parties will have to be inferred as there is not always going to be statements of intent from either or both parties. Lord Diplock went on to explain that this inference might also be a mere matter of fact. In many cases he explained and husband and wife purchase a matrimonial home by virtue of a mortgage, the capacity of each spouse to contribute to the monthly mortgage payments will usually come out of their separate earnings. However, a woman’s income might be altered by the introduction of children into the marital union. This, Lord Diplock stated should not operate to negate the common intention of both parties to acquire a